
I didn't really have a good reason to dislike the Winter Olympics, until two or three days ago, when it hit me.
The Winter Olympics are all about being the best in the world at a sport no one plays.
Think about it: how many people, worldwide, would you say curl? Even in Canada, where the sport is definitely the most popular, only 80,000 citizens play. Can we place the number anywhere near 1 million, worldwide? And even if we can, that's still only 0.000142857143 of the Earth's population.
So essentially, the curling gold medal winners are the best in entire world at a sport around one ten-thousandth of the world plays.
Forgive me for not being impressed.
Same problem in women's hockey. Apparently there are three nations capable of fielding a decent women's hockey team: Canada, the United States and Finland. The rest of the countries that competed in Vancouver were essentially happy to be there. So congratulations, Canadian women's hockey team! You're the best of three teams, worldwide, at what you do!
This can be applied to pretty much every event at the Winter Olympics. Bobsled? Check. Short track ice skating? Check. Ski jumping? Check. The biathlon? Check.
Now on the other hand, the Summer Olympics have a ton of events that everyone on earth can do. Sprinting? Everyone not in a wheelchair has done that at some time or another. Jumping? Same. Swimming? I'm willing to bet 80% of the world knows how to swim. And the number of soccer players the world over is staggering.
To get a gold at the Summer Olympics impresses me.
Not so much on the Winter side of things.
So now you know why this blog has had a distinct lack of Vancouver Olympics coverage.
Well, that, and general laziness.